Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BladeBryan
Ah, no; the footnotes associate by number. The footnote marked with '2' adds a note to the inline text likewise marked with '2' in superscript 2. In this case it is not, as you went by and quoted, the paragraph immediately above the footnote; it happens to be two paragraphs above

Are you really this stupid??? The footnote is the comment at the bottom of the page, not the superscript footnote number in the main composition. My previous comment was accurate.

Now it appears that you meant the Circuit Court, not the District Court, a simple mistake, yet you write that you thought the citation was, uh, "continued from the District Court."

It was a simple mistake, yet you still seem very confused. Did you not read the paragraph I quoted in support of my comment?? Go back and re-read it. If you still have questions, then we'll deal with them at that point.

57 posted on 12/25/2011 8:17:48 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

“Are you really this stupid??? The footnote is the comment at the bottom of the page, not the superscript footnote number in the main composition. My previous comment was accurate.”

Your comments are still there, showing that you associated footnote two which cited WKA with the paragraph immediately above it. That’s wrong. Footnotes associate with the body text marked with the same number. I linked to opinion so you can easily check it out. No sense throwing tantrums about it.


58 posted on 12/26/2011 8:24:53 PM PST by BladeBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson