And wouldn't that also mean that if other bailouts were to come under a Romney presidency, he would likely benefit in some way somehow.
I don’t mind the investments by Mitt. It is the calling out of Newt who was only a consultant for Fannie and/or Freddie that is hypocritical. Lets see if Michelle comes after Mitt on the issue.
Ping..
It’s a MUTUAL FUND...I don’t believe he gets to choose what bonds/stocks are in it....it probably has a lot of others, too. I’m not a Romney fan, but let’s not be ignorant.
U.S. government securities are a key ingredient in investment banking and corporate finance of all kinds.
I kind of lump private equity, banks, investment banks, etc., all into “big money”.
What is called “wall street” does not really exist in the form that it used to, since repeal of Glass-Steagall allowed investment banks to become banks and thus qualify to borrow from the Federal Reserve discount window.
The worldwide government debt bubble (including the U.S.) is currently forcing all sorts of machinations to keep the major banks of the world from having them admit their insolvency.
The top 3 French banks have balance sheets that in total are 3 times the size of the French GDP.
Mitt has lived in the world of big-money since the beginning of his career; he knows nothing else.
That is why he instinctfully offered the $10,000 bet. That first instinct - without time to consider what he was saying - was most revealing. To him $10,000 is a bet between friends.
This is what I try to convey on Mitt. He may be a nice neighbor, a great PE guy, but he’s not what the nation needs as a President.
Remember the movie Dave ? Where the guy’s accountant came and looked over the country’s books and solved things ? That’s what we need for a President now. Somebody from main street.
Bain Capital, has cut checks totaling $90,000 to Romneys operation.
so what - a lot of “government” funds are able to invest in these notes.