Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ObamaMustGo2012
There is a decided difference here. Newt Gingrich did not take a financial risk working for FNMA. Newt got his $1.6 million regardless of the tens of billions in financial losses that FNMA accumulated. Bain on the other hand did take a substantial financial risk and continues to do so in everything they do. And the money that Bain earned did not come from the US taxpayer. The money that Newt Gingrich earned did.

Gingrich should have simply kept his mouth shut and made Romney look stupid. Instead, he opened it with rash judgment and made himself look stupid. I suspect we will see a lot more of this over the upcoming months.

10 posted on 12/13/2011 3:15:36 AM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Hoodat

Exactly wrong.

Newt is way smarter than Romney. He was right to respond to Romney’s gaffe. He cut him off at the knees, rendering him impotent.

Which is what he will do to Obama.

This is a mere warning to Romney to surrender or you will get more of the same.


11 posted on 12/13/2011 3:22:37 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodat
"There is a decided difference here."

How so? If the point is both were involved in opening a business, then both did indeed assume the same risk. Choosing a single relatively low risk client from Newt's roster does not mean Mitt was more or less circumspect.

61 posted on 12/13/2011 7:57:36 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson