Johnny, one need not attend the Goebbles school of propaganda to identify ad hominem attack and circumstantial evidence to discredit an entire field of science. It’s amusingly old school - by 70+ years.
How about you speak to the dozens of good, government paid scientists who confirm LENR and confidence in LENR experiments? Bushnell, McKubre, Focardi, Mills, Miley, Ahern, Levi, Pinarelli, Hegelstein, Josephson, Kullander, etc. Or is rossi-ad hominem your only program?
“He was so narrow minded that if he fell on a pin it would blind him in both eyes” Fred Allen
Johnny, one need not attend the Goebbles school of propaganda to identify ad hominem attack and circumstantial evidence to discredit an entire field of science. It’s amusingly old school - by 70+ years.Wow, pretty ridiculous overreaching by someone who just joined the discussion.
I've documented a decade's worth of news articles about Rossi's various crimes, convictions and jail sentences, among many other reasons to not trust him.
And you reply yet again with the illogical argument that if anyone is doing legitimate LENR research, then it somehow must mean that Rossi is legitimate as well.
That's flawed logic, and your response is a rude attack. Why should anyone bother to discuss this with you? If you pull way back on the vitriol, perhaps you can become a useful part of this conversation. But has it stands right now, you're just a rude little boy who is screaming for attention.