1. he texted her
2. he gave her an undisclosed amount of $
3. his wife did not know about the money
4. his wife did not know about the woman
5. He also confirms he has helped other "friends".
Giving money away is great. Helping those in need is honorable. Having friends of the opposite sex is fine.
Repeatedly giving money to support a woman your wife does not know is foolish, and begging for scandal. Doing so while running for POTUS is stupid.
I decided that, personally, I can no longer support him, in spite of defending him previously over the bogus "sexual harassment" nonsense, especially Gloria Alred.
I agree we disagree, but don't be foolish enough to think I make my decision without data. However, when (not if) more revelations come to the fore, I will no longer be surprised. You will be.
You do not know what was in the messages.
You do not know who texted who.
You do not know how much money traded hands, if much at all.
You do not know how many friends he has helped, and how much.
We do know she has been sued for stalking and making
false claims against other people.
You’re “data” is all in your own head.
Convicting someone in the court of public opinion without all the facts is wrong. Even the Pharisees and Sadducees paid a friend of Jesus to betray him. Peter caved under the pressure 3 times, but he shook it off and pressed forward. They attacked Sarah and made her into something she wasn't. Should we let them do it again?
Come on, all aboard the CAIN TRAIN, lets take it all the way to the White House!!