Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring

The language used applying to U.S. citizens and legal resident aliens is only referring to SEC. 1032. REQUIREMENT FOR MILITARY CUSTODY.

Nothing is stated exempting U.S. citizens from detainment in SEC. 1031. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE

In addition the language used for U.S. citizens and legal resident aliens under SEC. 1032 says: “...THE REQUIREMENT TO DETAIN...” Meaning they may if they choose to, just not required.

Where is the clear language that U.S. citizens are exempt from being policed by the U.S. Military?


53 posted on 11/28/2011 3:41:57 PM PST by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigJ

>Where is the clear language that U.S. citizens are exempt from being policed by the U.S. Military?

Such language would be contrary to the Constitution (Art I, Sec 8):
“To provide for calling forth the Militia to **execute the Laws of the Union**, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;”


69 posted on 11/28/2011 6:07:20 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson