But I'll admit I'm shocked at how dumb, naive or duplicitous folks are who posit the “red card second class citizenship” with a straight face.
Newt can do it, but we know he's an exceptionally smooth liar who could argue both sides of any case with equal aplomb.
It’s a trip.
It’s getting rarer and rarer that the majority of posts on a thread have anything to do with the posted article or are in any way an attempt by the poster to make a substantive point or lay out an arguments on the merits for a candidate’s position or electability.
And look at this thread — I asked a poster if she had any points to make about the conclusions of the article and she somehow construed this as an “attack post”! (Actually, she wrote an “attach post.”)
Anyway, that’s just sad (and sort of hilarious at the same time). Here we are at one of the most well-known conservative debate forums on the internet, yet if you ask some people if they are or are not here to engage in the actual discussion — or you ask them what their thoughts are on this or that point made by the author — they scream that they have received an “attach post.”
But, like I said, their response makes my point very well. So, what’s not to complain about?