Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee; All
You're calling this an "apartheid"? That's more than a little extreme.

Why would you think that? Congress can determine whatever means it likes for establishing naturalization criteria and, certainly, illegal entry is a legitimate barrier the courts, including SCOTUS, should recognize.

Under Newt's expressed concept, red card holders can only apply for citizenship if they leave the country and apply from back home.

22 posted on 11/26/2011 6:15:32 PM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
I'm not calling it apartheid. I'm saying that's what the opponents will scream, all the way to the Supreme Court, and they will win easily, and red cards will become full citizenship.

Anybody who can't see that as clearly as the noonday sun on a cloudless day in June at the equator, I have a very good deal on a selection of New York bridges and tunnels.

24 posted on 11/26/2011 7:06:27 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

PS: what Newt says now as part of his sales pitch means ZERO. What counts is what will be argued in front of the SCOTUS, and in a billion years they will NEVER permit a “two-tier citizenship” to stand.

Again: noonday sun, bridges for sale in NYC.


26 posted on 11/26/2011 7:09:41 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson