dino: I gave you two examples of your statements. Sorry you don’t like having your own words thrown back at you.
***Basically, you are full of bowl sheet. For the benefit of lurkers I will rebuild the thread. It shows that you said there were lies. I asked for evidence of lies that I had “by my own admission” been aware of. You did nothing of the sort.
Original statement: he’s only lied about his education, criminal record, various companies, and (by your own admission, Kevmo) the performance and construction of his machine.
***Please provide evidence for this assertion.
Here’s one where you suggest that Rossi doesn’t want to provide physical evidence to back his claims:
***That is not a lie. That is, as you say, not backing up his claim with physical evidence.
Here’s one where you say that Rossi is intentionally witholding information regarding how his device works:
***That is not a lie. That is, as you say, intentionally witholding info.
I remember other posts from you where you outright said that Rossi is intentionally misleading about his device in order to protect his interest.
***And yet you do not provide the evidence. You are so full of bowl sheet.
Sure, I’ll bite. Rossi lied about his education, claiming to be a trained engineer when in fact his engineering degree is from a diploma mill. You yourself acknowledged that Rossi intentionally used the wrong company name. I am on a mobile and do not have a way to look up all your stupid Rossi posts right now, but I’ll find them later. In the meantime, perhaps you could try a bit of honest reflection about things you’ve written in defense of Rossi, whether they are consistent, and most of all, whether they are true.