No, I call you a "purist" for your vociferous rants. While the situation sucks, until the borders are sealed, it will continue to get worse. On the other hand, try to picture the logistics of actually trying to ship 10 million or more back to where they came from. To put it bluntly, it aint gonna happen. In today's world, we won't even do things of that proportion to those we are supposedly at war with. Plus, the border is so porous that as fast as we can move them out, they and others will pour back in. Read an article the other day about a perp who was deported 4 times, yet there he was do ing the crime.
Unless you can see the reality, you will remain a rabid "purist" - break out the guns and blindfolds because it would take a lot of "posses" of like mind going around and exterminating them to have it your way.
I guess it is asking too much for you to engage your brain enough to acknowledge how McCain has pushed the secure the border first mantra while actually doing nothing to help secure the border.
I guess it is asking too much to point out Janet Napolitano has declared the border to be secure, and that those pushing for amnesty will simply declare the deed to be done, facts on the ground to the contrary. That's how DC works.
And I guess it is asking too much to notice that this outfit, Krieber, is pushing for more immigrant workers at a time we are facing rampant unemployment.
And it is also asking too much for you to notice that Newt is opposed to a border fence, so he is opposed to one of the single most important line items in border security.
So in other words, I am rabid for engaging my brain and you are rational for disengaging yours.
Hey, at least you are as inconsistent as those who say long-term illegal immigrants are not breaking any laws.
And exactly who is suggesting such a thing? Why does that premiss always get included in a reason for a "comprehensive" solution.