[dirtboy]

What does your candidate suggest? For that matter, who is your candidate?

Ah, the typical ploy of a troll who can't defend his candidate's stance on its merits.

But I'll play - I am trying to decide between Cain and Perry.

Both have executive experience, both are from outside the Beltway swamps, and although I have issues with some of Perry's illegal immigration stances, he's still better than Newt, and at least Perry understands the 10th Amendment. Newt has no clue about the concept of limited federal government. He gives it lip service, but his history over the last 10 years indicates otherwise.

[Sudetenland]

Okay, we know what Perry’s plan is, pretty much the same thing as Newt, so now what is Cain’s solution? Bet it’s the same. When it comes down to brass tacks, some form of the Krieble plan is the only rational and achievable solution.

[oh8eleven]

Both have executive experience,
Interesting choice of words to obscure the fact that the pizza guy has never held public office.
I like Cain, but the WH is no place to start a new career.

[Sudetenland]

BTW, I have no problem with Newt's plan. It is rational, well thought out, achievable, solves most of the problems surrounding illegal immigration and holds true to the moral standards of conservatism that Newt mentioned during the debate.

It is also, ultimately, the position that all of the candidates will embrace whether they are willing to be honest about it or not. Congress will never pass an expulsion law and it will be nearly impossible to get some sort of strict enforcement of employment restrictions through any Congress. Too many businesses and political interests rely on the good will of the Latino community to allow that to happen.