Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bigbob

We are all missing something unfortunately. The claims are great, the specifics are nil.


18 posted on 11/22/2011 8:42:37 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: allmost

Maybe so, but my question is about the thermal-to-electricity conversion efficiency number used, which would be the same if he were burning coal vs. an E-Cat.

Semi-related - looks like Google isn’t his customer:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/23/google-idUSN1E7AL1X520111123


19 posted on 11/22/2011 8:48:23 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: allmost

The thought did not escape me. This subject has been that way for some time.


25 posted on 11/22/2011 9:40:49 PM PST by Dawggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: allmost; bigbob

“That is $0.54 / Watt of heat. Assuming the 20 year life Rossi claimed in the interview, the simple LCOE is so small as to make the energy almost free at $0.003 / kWh. At 30% efficiency heat kW to Ac kW with 3 Ac kW output, the electricity price rises to $0.01 / kWh...”

Figure in the gold nuggets in the steam behind your house and the fortune your great uncle is going to leave you and the cost is practically nothing/kW/hr./liter/cal. per slice over the entire backyard Tuesday.

Understand?


28 posted on 11/22/2011 9:48:54 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson