Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

I agree that fetal pain legislation is not a substitute for other pro-life legislation, but I fail to see why it is a bad thing to have a law that says you can’t inflict pain on the unborn.

I support fetal pain legislation as an incrementally better thing than what we have today, while we work toward the goal.


93 posted on 11/22/2011 11:44:54 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT; marty60
I support fetal pain legislation

Even to the prohibition of pre-natal surgeries to save the lives of babies?

Imagine...

102 posted on 11/22/2011 12:02:19 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Except, this legislation defines the child in the womb as a person, and then proceeds to allow the butchering of some of them.

Even Blackmun admitted in Roe that if the “fetus” is a person, they are explicitly protected by our Constitution.

Again, this legislation is immoral and unconstitutional.


123 posted on 11/22/2011 12:59:00 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Newt Gingrich: The go to guy when you're down to the bottom of the bottom of the barrel...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.”

“No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”


124 posted on 11/22/2011 1:03:07 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Newt Gingrich: The go to guy when you're down to the bottom of the bottom of the barrel...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson