Heh---nice take.
Perry actually thinking Pelosi would debate him (dumb).
Perry staging a stunt to raise his dwindling chances (dumber).
You and your buds better run on over to the Cain threads to try and prop up your guy. He needs it.
I doubt he thought she'd debate him.
Those who couldn't see that (dumb.)
Geez, Larry, you're getting your mustache hairs all over this thread.
I've been pondering this 'challenge' for quite a while and I just don't get it.
[And for the Perrybots, yes I read his letter.]
Pelosi isn't The Speaker so she doesn't control the House, or 'the purse'. So what's the point? Even if she accepts what will it prove? Including if he 'beat her' in said debate, what.....?!?
Really, did I miss something and Perry is now running for the House of Representatives from Nan's district? Heck if he wants a One-on-One debate with a pertinent RAT, challenge Obama. He's the one ignoring congress, the Constitution, the laws, spending the USA into oblivion, and acting like a tin-pot dictator.
Or if he's afraid of the smooth talking Barry, then at least challenge a RAT with some power, like Harry Reid. But San Fran Nan?!? That does not compute.
This 'challenge' to a now non-important House Rep. reminds me of that old lawyer joke:
When the facts are on your side, pound the facts.It's like Perry is 'Pounding The Table', just screaming for attention, to get his name back on page one. Nothing else makes sense.
When the law is on your side, pound the law.
When you have neither, pound the table.