If you have a convincing demo with numbers that make sense and work, present that. Don’t present nonsense that doesn’t add up and then spend your energy explaining where the “real” data is. Whining when people are unwilling to go get the data and sort the wheat from the chaff with no hope of ever eating the bread makes you look like an Academic looking for graduate slaves. Not interested.
I'm doing that. You refuse to look at it.
"Don’t present nonsense that doesn’t add up and then spend your energy explaining where the “real” data is. Whining when people are unwilling to go get the data and sort the wheat from the chaff with no hope of ever eating the bread makes you look like an Academic looking for graduate slaves."
Since you refuse to look at the information, how do you know that it is "nonsense that doesn't add up"?? The reports are perfectly straightforward. They even present the data in your preferred unit of "megaJoules" (among several others).
>> “If you have a convincing demo with numbers that make sense and work, present that. Don’t present nonsense that doesn’t add up and then spend your energy explaining where the “real” data is” <<
.
You’re asking to be spoon-fed; it isn’t going to happen, because your opinion, or reaction is of no concern to the researcher. Someone else may well be getting fed the reduced data, but not us.