[aNYCguy]

Why isn’t this flowmeter listed in the report’s canonical list of measuring devices used for the experiment?

Don't know and don't care.

Funny. Here's how I see these Rossi conversations going:

Skeptic: These claims don't add up.
Believer: All your questions are answered somewhere in this giant data dump of low-quality measurements mixed up in anecdotes and nonsense.
Skeptic: Okay, I looked through that and it has problems X, Y and Z.
Believer: Don't know and don't care.

[ZX12R]

Skeptic: These claims don't add up.

Believer: All your questions are answered somewhere in this giant data dump of low-quality measurements mixed up in anecdotes and nonsense.

Skeptic: Okay, I looked through that and it has problems X, Y and Z.

Believer: Don't know and don't care.

From one squawking seagull to another, that is a grand summation of these FRingie threads.

[dinodino]

Yep, that’s pretty much it.

[Wonder Warthog]

"Why isn’t this flowmeter listed in the report’s canonical list of measuring devices used for the experiment?

Let me explain this in simple words, and maybe you will get it. The flowmeter isn't shown in the formal "list of equipment"....but it is referred to multiple times in different places in descriptions of the demo. Therefore, the flowmeter was there, and used, despite the fact that it isn't "listed in the report's canonical list of measuring devices". Exactly why it got left out of the list, I neither know nor care. Other evidence proves its presence and use.

One of the participants makes the statement that when they left for the night, they focussed a video camera on the flowmeter to automatically take data in their absence. I thought that was a cute "trick" to turn a totalizing flowmeter into a real-time measuring device.