Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MamaTexan
If Iran had a nuke and they intended to use it against the US, the gov of Texas or any other state is not going to send the national guard to take care of it. That is the job of the fed govt. and they have the equipment to do it, the states national guard units don't.

It's called checks and balance.

Congress simply cannot dictate to the president that he should ignore a threat to the country and allow the country to be attacked.

This isn't 1776 where the big threat was wooden ships sailing into a harbor and begin lobing cannon balls into a city.

A country a half a world away can destroy cities with the push of a button.

A hand full of members of congress do not have the authority to say we are going to allow a city to be nuked and the president can't stop it.

98 posted on 11/14/2011 9:12:50 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: IMR 4350

Iran doesn’t have a nuke, and if they did they couldn’t launch it here anyway. Russia and China have ICBMs armed with nukes. Why aren’t you screaming for zero to attack them? N. Korea has nukes, how come we haven’t zotted them willy nilly?
The point here, is that if we believe that Iran is a threat we have ample time to a public debate and a declaration of war. Was Libya a threat? How about Vietnam? Korea? Bosnia? Kosovo? Now we are sending Special Forces troops to africa to help round up some thugs. Where is the threat there? Where does it end? The list just keeps getting longer and longer. When are you imperial presidency types gonna get tired of it all?


101 posted on 11/14/2011 3:39:07 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson