[Danae]

Its truly abysmal.

Actually I wasn’t speaking of Lockwood. Lockwood states the the statements on citizenship in Minor were a HOLDING: “In Minor, this court held”.

Go read Donofrio’s site. ALL of it.

Your internet articles aren’t doing anything other than rehashing the broken arguments made by others, which I repeat, have already been argued here by others, who have made better arguments by the way, and still failed.

Minor’s citizenship WAS relevant to the case, that was the means by which the case was brought. Apparently you have not READ the whole case! Tell us, what was that case all about ultimately?? Come on, an intelligent person could at least guess.... Women’s Suffrage. And you want me to take you seriously???? LMAO

[Squeeky]

LYAO??? OH, I like laughter!!! Here, laugh at this, which is from the 1876 American Law Review of your very important, wonderful citizenship case:

Ooopsies! They thought it was a suffrage case, too.