Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE

I have read a lot of Donofrio’s stuff lately and I am not impressed a bit. He is misrepresenting the law in a big way. There is a reason why 99.9999% of lawyers do not agree with him. It isn’t because he is sooo brilliant that he has figured out something no one else has. It’s because he can’t even get past a few sentences in Minor and understand:

For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these DOUBTS.

Anyway, the zombie movie I was watching is over, so I am going to bed. Good night.


51 posted on 11/12/2011 1:11:43 AM PST by Squeeky ("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Squeeky
solve these DOUBTS ...... to BASIC CITIZENSHIP REQUIRED TO VOTE.

Virginia wasn't running for President. They were simply RESOLVING her BASIC CITIZENSHIP.

They found she was a NBC, per their definition written in the decision.

53 posted on 11/12/2011 7:07:11 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Squeeky

I guess we could call this a living and breathing sentence in a court decision. I fail to see NBC in this sentence as others do. For some reason, I only see citizen, in a case resolving citizen rights:

“Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents.”


54 posted on 11/12/2011 7:27:11 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson