Note to Squeaky, adults xo not commonly use “so there” in an attempt to win a debate. Not even Rick Perry is a poor enough debater to use THAT 4th grade ruse. Not a good tactic there.
There are many people who continue to confuse this CONSTITUTIONAL LAW issue with the damned birth certificate including Levin. I put up my own personal Hawaiian birth documents in a deliberate effort to get past that bs. Shoot they are in a book! That being said, the decision in
MINOR is a holding and In Re Lockwood CONFIRMS it. “This court held”, and if was a unanimous holding at that.
I agree that people confuse Common Sense Suspicious Birthers with the Vattle Birthers. That is why you never see me teasing the die-hard Common Sense Suspicious Birthers. There is a basis for their doubts, even if I don’t agree with them anymore. I think Obama put out a screwy long form image to keep the issue alive.
But there is NO constitutional question that I can see on eligibility. Not even a little teeny-weeny glimmer of one. Some of these issues have been floating around since 1844, and they were loser arguments even then. Just because Minor gets cited on stuff does not make it precedent for defining natural born citizenship. You have to look at what it is being cited for. The Ankeny judges even said the Minor Court left the issue open.
Plus, if the case did what you claim it did, why come is Reality aligned against you??? Even little things like all the textbooks. The Obots have a website where they have textbook after textbook dating back for years and years where it just said that all it took was being born here. Nothing about needing two citizen parents. Not a peep. How did this happen, because this is something you have to explain to prove your theory.
There is just no way around this for you guys:
“For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these DOUBTS.”
Then, you can’t just ignore Wong Kim Ark like it doesn’t exist or something.