OK .. so you’re in your 20’s. You’ll be amazed at the wisdom you acquire by the time you’re 49 or 60 and how differently you communicate. I doubt you’ll be saying ‘so there! in a serious dialogue. Quite telling and immature, and one of the signs that showed me you were young.
I agree, Levin’s statement about Rubio is noteworthy.
I NEVER mentioned Vattel (it’s NOT Vattle).
The ‘Indiana thingie’ is laughable; no credible, informed person, other than an oBot, flaming liberal, or complete ignoramus about the issue, would use it to back up their position,
$50 to a credible Constitutional attorney? Wow. You get what you pay for.
However .. and lastly .. this thread is about the confirmed fraudulent removal and adulteration of case law by Tim Stanley of Justia and accompanying assistance by his comrades.
Why have you refused to respond to that?
And you would be surprised at how much a YOUNG mind is OPEN to New Thoughts and ideas. We are used to learning things and we can be taught New Tricks.
Now, as to the case law stuff, there has to be some justification as to why you classify this as fraud instead of a programming error. If the case is pretty much meaningless as to natural born citizenship, then you don’t have that. There is no reason to scrub this case.
If Minor v H was what you Vattle Birthers claim it was, then one or even two little online legal sites could not have scrubbed. Donofrio and Apuzzo would have learned it in law school as being the case that defined nbc.
Other lawyers would have learned the same thing. Wong Kim Ark just 23 years later would have used it to define NBC, instead of the English cases and other American cases. Or, it would have specifically over-ruled it. Judge Waite who wrote Minor would probably have not have sworn in Chester Arthur just 6 years later.
Arthur P Hinman would have used Chester Arthur’s non-citizen father to try to keep him from running. All the textbooks for the last 136 years would have said that it takes two citizen parents to run for president, instead of just being born here.
Jerome Corsi would have known this important fact, and put it in his book Obama Nation in 2008, which he didn’t and I know because I have a copy of it. The document I put above from 1876 would have said something about the case defining nbc. I could go on and on.
And if all this stuff is reality, which it is, then Minor v. Happersett did not define natural born citizenship. Which is all pretty obvious if you just read the sentence:
“For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.”