“Do you mean literal dead bodies?”
Yes.
“See, it’s stuff like this that I try not to respond to. Since when am I tolerating anything intolerable? Are you accusing me of tolerating Sandusky and Spanier, Schultz, and Curley?”
No. I am talking about bending over backwards to be ‘fair’ to paterno, who clearly tolerated the intolerable...which leads me to conclude that for you to defend him while knowing this is tolerating the intolerable as well.
And if it isn’t, please explain WHY it isn’t.
Why is it necessary to personalize a simple difference of opinion?
I'll take my answer on the air.
Well that is something I have never heard of. I can't argue against that.
paterno, who clearly tolerated the intolerable
It is not clear whether he tolerated it. That's the thing.