Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
when you have people with an incentive to promote racial polarization, you’re going to get more racial polarization. When you admit people not on the basis of qualifications to be there, but because or racial quotas, you then move very quickly from the students admitted by racial quotas to faculty hired for racial quotas.

And again, they have every incentive to create trouble, especially if they know that they do not meet the same standards as their colleagues. At Cornell, one of the tip-offs early on for me was that the Admissions Committee had trouble admitting a black student who had English SATs over 700. The people who were part of the local campus black establishment fought against the admission of this girl — the reason being that obviously she was qualified to be there and they wanted people who were going to be disaffected and, therefore, would be part of their campus base of power.

Ouch! No wonder higher ed is such a mess!! They have spent the past generation working to create an anti-intellectual academic Establishment!
Do you think Americans have a view of this country’s history of slavery that is probably too harsh, given the worldwide history of the institution?

Oh, I think the distortion is almost beyond belief. Tragically slavery existed for thousands of years of recorded history. For most of that period of time, the people who were enslaved and the people who enslaved them were the same race as a matter of logistics and wealth. There wasn’t the wealth or the technological means to go to another continent and transport people across an ocean. That just didn’t exist and when they finally did exist, you ended up with Europeans as well as Africans being transmitted into slavery — although this is seldom noticed.

For example, centuries ago the number of Europeans transplanted to North Africa as slaves exceeded the number of Africans transplanted to the United States and to the American colonies that preceded the United States. But that gets no attention whatever. Today looking back, it’s almost inconceivable that for thousands of years there was no serious challenge to slavery as a system — that you get the first serious challenge [to the legitimacy of slavery] in the late 18th century, and solely at that point within western countries. Nobody else saw anything wrong with it.

Sowell documented the worldwide history of slavery at more length in the second half of
Black Rednecks and White Liberals - Thomas Sowell

9 posted on 11/10/2011 12:44:54 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Ouch! No wonder higher ed is such a mess!! They have spent the past generation working to create an anti-intellectual academic Establishment!

I love it when Sowell speaks out on matters like this one, it absolutely infuriates the leftists. Shortly after his column is printed there are letters to the editors across the country with leftists saying what a rube Sowell is, they usually succeed in showing their own ignorance. There's one in the local rag now that refers to Sowell's column regarding the occupy mobs and the letter writer compares these mobs with Colonist's protesting the British.

Thanks for the "Black Rednecks and White Liberals" link.

10 posted on 11/10/2011 8:33:54 AM PST by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson