Why is this less believable than Romney lies,
Romney dog abuse, Romney fascism, and Romney coverrups?
“Why is this less believable than Romney lies,
Romney dog abuse, Romney fascism, and Romney coverrups?”
Well, I’m not sure what you mean by “dog abuse” “fascism”, even “coverrups”, but I don’t think it’s hard to level the charge that Romney is a liar. When he says he’s been as “consistent as a human being could possibly be”, that is clearly a false statement, not to mention also being an insult to the intelligence of anyone with an IQ higher than Forrest Gump.
No-I have no personal dislike for Romney, he seems like a nice enough guy. But I vehemently oppose him as our nominee because he’s brought flip-flopping to a level never before seen. There’s no way to know for sure where he really stands on anything, but if his record as gov of Mass is any indication, he is politically on par with Scott Brown, who is the second or third most liberal Republican in the Senate-and there’s a lot of competition in the Senate for the top RINO award. Since Brown was Romney’s point man in the Mass state senate, his politics are a good indicator of how Romney might govern.
Being a RINO is bad enough, but what’s worse with Romney is he’s unelectable too. With the transparency of his flip-flopping plain as day for all to see on YouTube, it wont take a billion dollar budget to educate the public to this fact. Conservative turnout will be more depressed than with McCain, and there is a very real possibility of a 3rd party getting around 20% of the vote if Romney gets in-especially if it’s a case where he splits the vote roughly 4 ways and gets no more than 30% to 35% in any contest. This will enrage conservatives, cause we’ll know we’ve been played by the “divide and conquer” strategy of the GOP elites.
Bottom line-there is really nothing redeemable about nominating Romney. Still, all that said, I think this airplane story is utter nonsense.