The significant part to me is that the NRA has now publicly said that the woman can talk ALL SHE WANTS. And she is choosing not to.
The woman is choosing not to......now.
But this is the opening act. Now that she is free to talk, she is free to be published.
A win, perhaps, but I don’t trust the sleaze on the other side.
No, the significant part is that Herman Cain argued against the complaint It was the NRA that settled with the complainant; not him. He wasn’t a party to it. That’s BIG!
It justifies Herman Cain’s handling of this. Politico never told the Cain campaign any of the particulars. Thus Cain, not being a party to the settlement, had nothing to defend himself against. Those who believe he handled this wrong are just plain wrong themselves.