Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark

Could be, but that’s why I want to see all the facts. What if the women are right?


304 posted on 11/01/2011 10:20:20 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]


To: Victoria Delsoul
There is genuine harassment, and there is the liberal version of shake down.

I have seen both in my life, from what I see, this is likely the liberal version.

Clinton was an example of the heavy handed harassment, entitled to sex from his subordinates because of his position, plus he was a democrat and could get away with it by pretending to care; there isn't a hint of that here, which tells me it's the liberal version, aka shakedown. Clarence Thomas redux.

409 posted on 11/01/2011 11:36:58 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]

To: Victoria Delsoul

This is just arrogant.

It’s no different than those people reading a NYT column and then saying they can evaluate better than the Supreme Court whether the evidence meets the legal standard to impose the death penalty.


438 posted on 11/02/2011 12:15:33 AM PDT by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson