Could be, but that’s why I want to see all the facts. What if the women are right?
I have seen both in my life, from what I see, this is likely the liberal version.
Clinton was an example of the heavy handed harassment, entitled to sex from his subordinates because of his position, plus he was a democrat and could get away with it by pretending to care; there isn't a hint of that here, which tells me it's the liberal version, aka shakedown. Clarence Thomas redux.
This is just arrogant.
It’s no different than those people reading a NYT column and then saying they can evaluate better than the Supreme Court whether the evidence meets the legal standard to impose the death penalty.