” Bennett is calling on the association to waive the agreement so the woman..”
It should have been Cain calling on the association
from the beginning.
Cain should have had this all ready to go so when the question
finally came from Politico-and they gave him 10 days notice that it would -
he could have said;
“ The charges were baseless and I have asked the NRA
to waive all confidentiality agreements.
With the identity of the complainants kept secret.”
Cain is now using a variation of it depends
on what the meaning of “ is “ is
by saying he originally expressed ignorance of “ settlements “
because he only thought
there were “ agreements.”
Joel Bennett told CNN tonight that it was his understanding
that a board member of the NRA tipped off Politico.
Another pundit said that this came to light
for the board,
when they recently began discussing
whether to endorse Cain.
Some board members informed the rest of the members
about the settlements
and discouraged the endorsement.
There are 90 to 95 board members nationwide
it would have been impossible to contain
this once they all knew.
Why in the world should a case that has been closed for over a decade be re-opened so we can have a he-said she-said debacle where there is not even any way to prevent outright lying?
WHAT is to be gained from that?
And WHY would any conservative, no matter who they are supporting in this primaries, actively advocate this debacle be visited upon a candidate so as to suck all the oxygen out of the entire race?
ARE YOU NUTS?
(Yes, I’m shouting, and I’m not apologizing for it.)