Posted on 11/01/2011 7:53:42 PM PDT by bullypulpit
By the way, unlike the Cain staffers trolling Free Republic, I am real. Joe Hyde on LinkedIn.
See if any Cain staffer will put their name on a post here.
I know, it's unproductive to sit around and wait until hell freezes over.
Much ado about nothing, really.
Illegal lover? is that the same as a sexual harasser?
And explain to me how Perry is a racist AND and Illegal Lover?
He’s a xenophobe and a racist according to some.
Hard to say. Who was Clinton’s VP??
I’m not talking about this thread. This thread is fun. And it started with an really mean and nasty attack on Cain which was awful but which I admitted enjoying.
I’m talking about Perry threads wherein someone posts a link to a Perry speech or statement ... usually something great that Perry said or did, and then the vultures attack.
If you haven’t been there, don’t judge those of us who’ve had to suffer the abuse. Fortunately, we still seem to be standing.
“This is a non-serious forum full of non-serious Cain supporters ...” Then just go away, stinky.
The bottom line is that Mr Cain was aware of this for 20 years and took over 24 hours to even start responding.
He got soft balls for two more days and here we are.
Did anyone see Herman on Bret’s panel and BOR tonight? I found his answers to be somewhat vague and hard to understand. When Ted Baxter asked why he didn’t get a campaign rapid response team going on answers for the possible exposure of this scandal, did he say they didn’t have time?
For instance, when one of the panelists(forgot her name) asked him about whether he was pro abortion in cases of rape and incest, he said no, absolutely not.
But then he again said that the woman and her family could choose in “extraordinary” circumstances..but was unable to give an example of what that would be.
Bret, Krauthammer, the rest of them looked uncomfortable. Kraut was leaning away from Cain. Tanya(body lang. expert): where are you when we need you?
That wasn't my intent. And I have no clue what you are feeling inside or what you have been through. I wanted to let you know that despite our different points of view that I respect you and your service to our country. Unfortunately the tactics that work so well on bombing runs are not necessarily as successful at winning people over to your point of view. Attempting to destroy every candidate other than your own might even be counterproductive.
Perry has exposed himself, but you want to cover it with lies about Cain.
I am itching for the purge of you idiots.
Hah! mid-nineties? How far back do you people go in calling Rick Perry a democrat.
I think Cain is a good man and conservative socially. The abortion fiasco seems to have died down and well it should, but I still wonder how conservative he would be regarding entitlement and such issues involving blacks.
After all, he sat in the amen corner of that church for years where they preached affirmative action.
AMEN
Well the reason I don’t know about the history on those Perry threads, is that I don’t read them.
Last time I went deliberately onto a Perry thread I think, Palin was still in the running. Somewhere around the time of her speech at Indianola, when she spend an hour after the speech milling with her supporters, and it was all covered on CSPAN.
Funny thing is, what you’re saying here about Cain supporters, is almost exactly what was being complained about then, about Palin supporters.
:D
Proof?
Not a lot of people seem to be offended by the hatchet job that has been done on Perry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
we were disgusted by the attacks on Perry....I truly think zero is afraid of him...and karl rove as well.
That you choose to mischaracterize something like that says more about what a dead soul operative you are, and frankly, I don't believe Rick Perry would appreciate your filthy innuendos. I don't think Jim Robinson would either and that's why I pinged him. You stink, buddy. You stink of sulfur
Despite all the innuendos and allegations made against Perry, they can’t bring any sexual harassment scandals against him. Perry never used his CEO status to sexually harass anyone, and if anything was in his past we would’ve learned of it by now. A few months ago, Michael Moore offered $1 million to any woman who would come forward with details about having bedded Perry or had an affair with him.
The victim in the Cain case is going to come forward, and sooner or later we will hear from her. She is trying to get a release from the confidentiality clause which under the settlement agreement obligates her to remain silent. Yet, Cain has gone from network to network changing his story, but also badmouthing this woman as a gold digger who wanted a huge amount of money for something he never did, or at worst for something as innocuous as comparing her height to his wife’s height. Such profoundly stupid statement insults my intelligence. There is no sexual harassment in comparing someone’s height to another person's height. I found that not only to be patronizing but utterly unbelievable. Perhaps it is the kind of comment that his followers will offer as 'facts' since they cling to every word he utters.
I want to hear the other side of the story, and I am sure most Americans want to hear it as well.
It is illogical to suggest that these women went after Cain some 15 years ago for political reasons when no one knew at the time that Cain would one day run for political office. I’m interested in finding out if Cain, as the CEO of a big company, exercised his power over subordinate female employees in an unlawful way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.