Didn’t people right here on FR say that this was no big deal? /rhetorical question
I certainly don’t know about that .. others more
knowledgeable than I will be better sources, but .. as stated in the article:
“JUSTIA’S MANIPULATION OF THE OYEZ PROJECT CREATED THE FALSE IMPRESSION OF US SUPREME COURT ENDORSEMENT.
ustia is one of the prime benefactors of the Oyez Project:
“The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent is a multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court of the United States and its work. It aims to be a complete and authoritative source for all audio recorded in the Court since the installation of a recording system in October 1955. “
While Oyez is listed at the US Supreme Court’s website as a source of Supreme Court information, Justia is not.
However, Justia has used its status as a prime benefactor of Oyez to piggy-back upon Oyez thereby giving the false impression that the US Supreme Court endorses Justia while it does not.”
Doesn’t sound flimsy to me. We shall see ..
They are very incorrect. Read Leo ‘s site, the last oh 5 to 6 articles. The man has a real gift for seeing the details. Look at the images. I saw those live, on my own monitor. I watched them shut down the wayback machine, just like leo said they would. (((((Bink)))))) there they go. And a bs code excuse? And what they scrubbed, the other content they removed, and shines new citations not in the original?
Yeah... it adds up to not looking pretty.