Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cain Accuser Got a Year’s Salary in Severance Pay ($35k)
NY Times ^ | November 01, 2011 | JIM RUTENBERG, JEFF ZELENY and MIKE McINTIRE

Posted on 11/01/2011 6:57:34 PM PDT by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: CaptainK

Mr. Cain need do nothing more than call Bill Clinton and ask him how long he’s known Br’r Bennett ~


41 posted on 11/01/2011 7:50:00 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

“There are a lot of worthless employees out there who, when they realize that their days with a company are numbered, come up with a “discrimination” or “sexual harassment” complaint as a way of leaving with with little more walking around money.”

Irrespective of this particular case, and for the record I support Cain, I have also seen real harassment, sexual and otherwise, and the people who do it generally get away with it. On the other hand, you are right that people will also bring cases to either get ‘revenge’ or to make money. Neither is acceptable.


42 posted on 11/01/2011 7:50:03 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
SEVERENCE PAY

This is an amount of money you are given when you are let go from a company.

This is NOT a SETTLEMENT as in a court case or out of court case, nor is it hush money or anything else. Please don't help the liberal media. Severance pay is not uncommon when an employee is fired.

43 posted on 11/01/2011 7:50:26 PM PDT by justsaynomore (Cain 2012 - http://teamcain.hermancain.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21
so now how can she speak out?

She can and she will lie and be paid well. There is no honor among the jackals on the left.

44 posted on 11/01/2011 7:51:26 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (999er for Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Yeah. I just have seen what I talked about happen so many times. When the handwriting is on the wall for a piece of deadwood, the “complaints” come out.


45 posted on 11/01/2011 7:52:19 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Stop Government Greed Now!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Anything less than half a million against the president of the company is a joke. 35k isn’t even worth the time it took to write out the check.


46 posted on 11/01/2011 7:55:25 PM PDT by bgill (The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

Sorry, Herman made his own bed by continually changing his story in the last few days. I’m afraid he is toast.


47 posted on 11/01/2011 7:58:06 PM PDT by RightFighter (It was all for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
The lawyer said the confidentiality agreement had left her unable to respond to Mr. Cain’s dismissal of the complaints against him as a “witch hunt” or to his denials of any inappropriate behavior toward the women.

Grrrrrrr!! This makes me so angry! This particular woman is not the person who is being wronged here! SHE got her settlement for anything Cain did or did not do wrong back in the 1990's. SHE is not being named by name, so there is no SHE here.

HE is the one who has been publicly named, and HE is the one who's name is being drug through the mud. So can HE sue HER now for harassment???

If she would just keep her head down, keep her mouth shut, keep to herself, and go on about her business, then there would be no problem here. The parties involved had an agreement that said the matter was resolved. For better or worse, they signed on the dotted line and paid/accepted the money, so it is OVER.

Now only HE is being drug through the mud. SHE is not being harmed here. SHE doesn't need to clear anything up, and SHE doesn't need to, nor does she have a right to "respond to" anything Cain says, no matter how dismissive he is on the matter. She accepted the check, end of story.

48 posted on 11/01/2011 7:59:00 PM PDT by BagCamAddict (Order 15 Herman Cain Yard Signs for $130: https://store.hermancain.com/orderform.asp?pid=20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Settlements don’t always mean guilt. For example, depending on where you work and what insurance you have, as a physician you may have to agree to accept settlement if the insurance company and/or hospital thinks this would be a cheaper and better option than fighting the case in court. It would really be horrible if the plaintiff was able to collect settlement money from a frivolous lawsuit, and then be able to trash the physician publicly. This could be similar. It’s probably a lot cheaper to settle for $35,000 than to fight a case in court, where jury decisions can be unpredictable.


49 posted on 11/01/2011 8:00:06 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

True. That ‘s about 60-100 hours of preliminary litigation in the 1990s and loss of reputation for NRA.


50 posted on 11/01/2011 8:02:06 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
"...like Justice Thomas went through. This is simply one thing, TO DESTROY MR. CAIN, no matter what."

With Thomas he was only working to be confirmed by the Senate. Cain is making his appeal to the entire population. This gambit by "occupy Politico" just might backfire. It has given Cain a huge amount of free air time and if he learns to turn the conversation away from this smoke screen and use it to his benefit it may be a gift.

51 posted on 11/01/2011 8:05:47 PM PDT by Baynative (The penalty for not participating in politics is you will be governed by your inferiors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

From a caller to Mark Levin today, $35k is the “industry standard” settlement, the baseline cost a firm’s insurer would incur to mount a defense. Therefore, the insurer will offer that as settlement and the ambulance chaser will be more than happy to take his or her cut.


52 posted on 11/01/2011 8:07:41 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (So much stress was put on Bush's Fault that it finally let go, magnitude 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter

I for one agree with the way he has delt with the jackels in the press.


53 posted on 11/01/2011 8:10:57 PM PDT by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da

Severance just means you left, not that you were fired (though that, and retirement are most common reasons).


54 posted on 11/01/2011 8:22:30 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jay Santos CP
One more cost of doing business in the US.

That's exactly right. My wife is an expert Human Resources consultant who handles these cases daily. The tragedy is that it's far more cost-effective to pay these parasites off than to fight them in court. They walk with an easy $60-$100 K, a fraction of the $600,000 the company would have to spend on lawyers and other costs before the first day of the trial.

55 posted on 11/01/2011 8:24:14 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

images

PLEASE CONSIDER DONATING TO FREE REPUBLIC TODAY OR BECOMING A MONTHLY DONOR

PLEASE CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE TO DONATE
Credit afnamvet


56 posted on 11/01/2011 8:28:26 PM PDT by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
I have also seen real harassment, sexual and otherwise, and the people who do it generally get away with it. On the other hand, you are right that people will also bring cases to either get ‘revenge’ or to make money.

Or to take it out on someone they can nail.

57 posted on 11/01/2011 8:29:39 PM PDT by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

They ALL get $35k!
That’s the going rate for settling these fraudulent suits.
Has been for quite awhile now.


58 posted on 11/01/2011 8:53:29 PM PDT by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Your post made me very uncomfortabe.

I kinda enjoy being made "uncomfortable."

59 posted on 11/01/2011 8:53:35 PM PDT by 50mm (Trust nobody and you'll never be disappointed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
The tragedy is that it's far more cost-effective to pay these parasites off than to fight them in court.

I've got no legal background whatsoever. But this is solved with tort reform. The loser pays the costs of the case. If it's a fraudulent, frivolous case, it won't be filed. It's that simple.

We are being robbed by these people. Our industries are being robbed and our government is now completely in their control. It's a crime syndicate everywhere you turn.
60 posted on 11/01/2011 8:59:09 PM PDT by Jay Santos CP ("Idiocracy"... It's no longer just a movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson