“Apologies for spoiling your point, but this quote doesn’t substantiate its claim.”
Ah, no. When you decide to overrule the real court, you’re *demonstrating* my point, not spoiling it. My point, in case you missed it: “Quite different from trying it your imagination, isn’t it?”
Your “real” court was a lower court that couldn’t support its reasoning in its decision. I’ve shown directly how it was wrong. The only imagination at work was this judge who claimed that Art II left Congress with the role of defining citizenship. The Constitution reserved the power of naturalization for Congress in Art I Sec 8, and we already know that naturalized citizens are not eligible for president. Tell me your smart enough to understand that much.