[going hot]

In this case, there actually was a complaint that had merit for consideration by the courts, which is why they settled out of court, to keep it from escalating into a much higher settlement.

Sounds convincing. No doubt you were there, second row, center, witnessing the whole drama as it unfolded.

So, what was the nature of the actual alleged harassment?

Do all complaints that the courts consider have actual merit, prior to consideration?

They settled out of court precisely because the case had merit, and the plaintiff accepted the chump change settlement, because the case had merit? Why would the plaintiff advance an allegation which had such merit as to be considered by the court, and then actually shown to have merit, settle out of court?

Maybe the court is lying, and the plaintiff actually received much more?

Questions, questions...

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Read the details of the case for yourself. There is undoubtedly much more to come. Especially now that Cain denies everything. When in reality, there IS something, or else those 5 figure out of court hush payments would not have been made.

This won't just go away. It is only getting started. You know, what your group refers to as the “Vetting Process”.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-cain-denies-20111030,0,1342921.