Read my comment again...A bit slower this time.
"Will the Girl Scouts need to change their name to the Girly Boy Scouts?"
BTW, you might have missed it, but my post was facetious in nature.
Yes you missed that I knew your post was facetious, my point was the author is as screwed up as your facetious post
You're saying I missed that you knew my post was facetious, but rather it was I that missed that you knew it was facetious??
Is this dial an argument?
Your drunk?
When a facetious post is made to a facetious thread, then it's incumbent upon the facetious thread poster to facetiously acknowledge the facetiousness of the initial poster's post -- so long as the FIRST facetious post is recognized as facetious by both parties.
If, however, the "facetiousness" of the article post (or the "facetiousness" of the original thread poster) is not quickly recognized by both parties, then all traces of facetiousness should be summarily abandoned.
It's the right thing to do.
Frankly, I can’t believe you’re arguing with me, and I have no idea over what. I’m quite sober.