1 posted on
10/25/2011 8:28:18 PM PDT by
ccwman
To: ccwman
If “opportunity zones” are good for distressed cities, then make them national and permanent.
2 posted on
10/25/2011 8:44:22 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: ccwman
It appears that not everyone read the 9-9-9 analysis - or maybe it's like talking to a 'brick wall' if they have!
Instead of snide remarks & attempts at childish humor - how about a discussion from those about what they find as a problem to the plan - if in fact, they even understood what they read.
9 posted on
10/25/2011 9:27:43 PM PDT by
LADY J
( Change your thoughts and you change your world.. - Norman Vincent Peale))
To: ccwman
Ahh. Thanks for posting that analysis.
Citizens, then, are empowered to eliminate bureaucratic policies that get in the way of job creation. His policy proposes elimination of the minimum wage; the elimination of union derived prevailing wage rates, and the creation of school vouchers, among other things. Understand, these are not mandated, but are requirements to be part of an opportunity zone. A community could continue to do business as usual but miss the important job growth elements of his plan and remain uncompetitive to those communities around them, and not make the changes being asked, its their choice.
All in all, the idea of these OZs is actually quite brilliant and paves the way for phase #2 of 999 which abolishes income taxes entirely. And reform the culture back towards one of self-sufficiency and local governance, rather than one based on Federal dependency.
To: ccwman
(Excerpt) Read more at ccwmanonfire.blogspot.com ... Why excerpt your own writing?
Looking for a few blog hits perhaps?
11 posted on
10/26/2011 6:04:27 AM PDT by
humblegunner
(The kinder, gentler version...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson