This is interesting, but there’s no memory hole for the internet. Scrubbing an entire case from the record is like trying to get pee out of a pool. It’s in there. People can still find Minor v Happersett without “dusty law texts” and “expensive legal research services.”
Thats true, but this wasn’t directed at people capable of researching in a Law Library. Certainly not for those with $$$ Subscriptions to Lexis and Westlaw. No this was pointed at the average blogger... millions of Americans who would trust that “Full text of case” actually MEANT full text of case as opposed to a tampered one. Justia.com is a free site, it pays the salary of its people through advertising and click throughs.
See the point here yet?