I'm still trying to figure out why anyone would go through the trouble of concocting such an ineffective conspiracy...much less actually trying to pull it off.
I’m still trying to figure out why anyone would go through the trouble of concocting such an ineffective conspiracy...much less actually trying to pull it off.
Simple, they are desperate to hide the truth, more below:
The Internet Archive Now Complicit
in NYS BOE Website Cover-Up
by
Pixel Patriot
10/24/2011
http://pixelpatriot.blogspot.com/2011/10/internet-archive-nys-boe-cover-up.html
“I’m still trying to figure out why anyone would go through the trouble of concocting such an ineffective conspiracy...much less actually trying to pull it off.”
What, you’re saying this sequence of events doesn’t make sense to you?
- Sometime prior to July 6, 2008, someone at Justia.com (possibly Obama-supporter Tim Stanley) decides that Minor v Happersett is detrimental to Obama.
- Justia decides to respond, but not by deleting the text of Minor v Happersett from its website.
- Instead, Justia removes references to the case name “Minor v Happersett” and its citation in the pre-1875 Supreme Court reporters (21 Wall 162).
- Then, in the place of the information it removed, Justia puts hyperlinks to the Minor v Happersett page on Justia.com, utilizing the more common U.S. Reports locations for that case (88 US 165).
- Then for some reason, Justia also does the same thing for other pre-1875 cases. So, in Luria, it also substitutes hyperlinks for case names for Osborn v. Bank of United States and for U.S. v. Babbitt.
- Then sometime prior to April 2010, Justia added back in the case names and original reporter numbers, but also retained the hyperlinks to the US Reporters.
- And Justia did all of this to hide the significance of Minor from the general public, even though it knew that this would have no effect on lawyers or actual legal experts, who use Lexis or Westlaw.
- And Justia also did all this to hide the significance of Minor, even though by replacing the case name with a direct hyperlink, it was actually making it EASIER and FASTER for readers to locate the Minor decision if they were reading Luria.
I'm still waiting to read the evidence that anyone actually did anything here, rather than it being just a database screwup. It seems like everyone went right from "some references were missing" to "scrubbed!" and "sabotage!"
No doubt a high tension thinker such as yourself couldn't have missed anything. I would suggest it was done for the same reason as this was done.
Liberal twits doing anything they can think of to help their "zero hero" win. Hollywood is full of them, and no doubt Justia is as well.