Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
The issue is not whether Minor could be found but whether non-lawyer members of the “court of public opinion” such as journalists and ordinary citizen researchers would be triggered by subsequent citations to look for the Minor case as precedent.

It is now obvious that Minor was cited in numerous cases as SCOTUS precedent on the definition of natural born citizen rendering claims moot that Minor just discussed NBC as “obiter dictum.” It is these citations included in SCOTUS cases subsequent to Minor that the Justia conspirator removed.

As Danae said:

“The manipulation at Justia.com diluted the importance of Minor by killing the citations in Supreme Court cases spanning over 100 years. Since Google most often returns Justia.com’s version of the case being searched for as the first or second hit, Justia’s version of Supreme Court opinions are most influential in the blogosphere's forums and comments. Erasing those citations and text on the Internet literally erases the importance of Minor and its precedents to millions of Americans otherwise unlikely to ever step into physical Law Library.”

21 posted on 10/24/2011 11:12:11 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

“It is now obvious that Minor was cited in numerous cases as SCOTUS precedent on the definition of natural born citizen “

Totally false. It simply did not happen. That is why the issue was debated before the Supreme Court with WKA years later. They would not have accepted arguments about it if it had been previously settled.


24 posted on 10/24/2011 11:21:28 AM PDT by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson