“I also don’t like Cain’s comments about black Empowerment Zones, but those things aside, I like Cain.”
They’re not BLACK empowerment zones. The zones would apply to ANY community where there is very high unemployment and few opportunities for the people living there. As I understand it, the states themselves will choose which areas are in the greatest need - they put in an application and the fed will pick the best ones.
Black, white, Hispanic... I’m quite sure some American Indian areas will qualify.
Empowerment zones are race neutral.
Except, why does the Federal Government have the power or the right to do that?
Except, if you are poor, including the working poor, and you don’t live in a chosen empowerment zone, you are out of luck.
Except, areas tend to be racial or ethnic in large portion, with those of a particular race or ethnicity dominating that area.
From my observation, those areas are usually not white, not anglo. There can be exceptions such as maybe in poor appalachia or the ozarks or some places like those, but for the most part there aren’t large areas of poor whites, rather, whites who are poor tend to be scattered.
A mixed neighborhood...one that is old, built before houses were mass produced that were all the same, contains a mix. Right next door or down or across the street from each other are rich, poor and in between.
The Federal Government needs to mostly go away out of lives, rather than be empowered with empowerment zones...
Then why did Cain refer to them as places with a high concentration of blacks on October 14 th in his CNN interview? Oh right another joke or misunderstanding. Too bad he said it twice.
What this does, because you have a lot of African-Americans located in cities like Detroit, disproportionately, it would encourage businesses to stay in business there or to move there. It would encourage people to work there, because if you live in the empowerment zone, youre going to pay a smaller percentage in taxes. Herman Cain Oct. 14th CNN