Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

When you jumped in with both feet to the eligibility issue, I checked one year of your comments. One year. Average three comments a day, all about western trivia, western movie trivia, and arcane denominiational topics.

One solid year, it was easy because you didn’t post much. Then, wowie zowie - all of a sudden, you totally changed, tone changed (someone you had previously discussed with freepmailed me because they had noticed a very unusual change in your tone and attitude all of a sudden, and several freepers had noticed, and didn’t want to continue disucussing with you any more). Then you started nontstop on your insane and irrational eligibility trolling crap.

Odd, very odd.

When you started the attacks on eligibility threads, you had been here 11 years with 11,000 posts - that’s less than 3 comments a day on average. That’s just an observation.

You’re transparent and no amount of frothing and steaming fools anyone; it merely makes you more obvious.


78 posted on 10/24/2011 8:25:07 AM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

Liar.

At a minimum, if you went through a year of my posts, you would have read 1,000 posts - just out of curiosity about me. That would suggest you are desperately in need of a life!

And since I can’t recall ever posting about movie trivia or western trivia (or much about movies or western life at all, ever), you are a liar.

And since anyone can click on my name and start reviewing, it would be easy to see that you are a liar.

“Then you started nontstop on your insane and irrational eligibility trolling crap.”

Except that has never happened either. Ever. So again, you are a liar.

But that isn’t unusual, because a fundamentally honest person would read a couple of court cases and realize that birthers are full of crap. That they lie about things, such as what the Minor decision was about and what it said concerning NBCs.

“At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.”

For emphasis:

“For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.”

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_ZO.html

Oh golly! Look at that! The Minor decision can be found, online, free, at places other than justica!


80 posted on 10/24/2011 10:05:53 AM PDT by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson