Beyond what I’ve read today, and bits and pieces recently, I know very little about the man. So no, I can’t say that he would. Perhaps you know more about him than I.
Frankly though, I’m neither waiting for nor expecting the Court to overturn Roe. They’re not the “conscience” of America. We are, all of us. And we need a president who will take the political lead in putting an end to the bloodshed of our children - a president who will direct his considerable power against it, who will give hope to those already fighting in this cause, who will devise and lead the campaign that will put this abomination (to use Lincoln’s words) “in the course of ultimate extinction.”
Forget the Court. Elect a man with the courage to fight for children whose own parents want them dead.
I would agree that a Constitutional Amendment would be the best bet, but given Cain’s statement, I am not sure he would do that.
Perry has said he would support an Amendment defining marriage as between 1 man and 1 woman so it might be possible that he could be asked to lead the charge on abortion as well.
In the meantime, I would settle for an overturn of Roe —that would once again allow the states to decide for themselves.