Replies

To: rzman21; yarddog; Texas Eagle

So a question for Mitt is if he would accept blood transfusions if as President he needed them in a life saving situation.

12 posted on 10/10/2011 2:33:31 PM PDT by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)

To: killermosquito

Choose between Obama and Romney.

13 posted on 10/10/2011 2:37:27 PM PDT by verity (The Obama Administration is a Criminal Enterprise.)

To: killermosquito

Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t accept blood transfusions, Mormons do.

14 posted on 10/10/2011 2:40:43 PM PDT by chickenlips (Karl Rove- the RINO ruminator, striking fear in donuts everywhere)

To: killermosquito

I could never vote for Romney but it has nothing to do with his being a Mormon.

15 posted on 10/10/2011 2:41:30 PM PDT by yarddog

To: killermosquito

So a question for Mitt is if he would accept blood transfusions if as President he needed them in a life saving situation.

Mormons don't believe in blood transfusions? I thought that was the Jehovah's Witnesses. I guess it could be both.

I'm guessing he would. But I don't know. Don't care. I think his policies are the issue and those what we should focus our attention on. Everything else is a distraction. In this case, the distraction serves a dual purpose. To divide Republicans but also make us look like bigots.

Liberals have no qualms about standing up for Christian values when it serves their purpose. And, trust me, if they can tarnish us by saying Romney lost the nomination because of our religious bigotry, you better bet your bottom dollar they would shout that from the mountaintops.

Hallelujah! Can I get an Amen!?

20 posted on 10/10/2011 3:01:20 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794