Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii Court Sets Hearing About Obama's Birth Certificate: Fox News Will Be In Attendance
BirtherReport.com ^ | 10/07/2011 | Orly Taitz

Posted on 10/07/2011 6:24:48 PM PDT by GregNH

From attorney Orly Taitz: Update! My hearing in HI, in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka is in 5 days, October 12th, 8:30 am. If you are a resident of Honolulu or if you are visiting Honolulu on October 12th and you are a supporter of mine, please, come to the hearing to support me. First circuit court of HI, Judge Rhonda Nishimura, 777 Punchbowl str., Honolulu, HI, October 12th 8:30 am.

This case was filed against the registrar Alvin Onaka and Director of Health Loretta Fuddy, seeking access to the original birth certificate of Barack Obama for expert examination.

If you are a tea party member in HI, please, relate this message to the Tea Party members, Republican party members or any decent resident of HI, who wants the truth and justice to prevail. Please, relate this message to the local media.

FOX reporter will be in the courtroom during October 12th hearing in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; hopespringseternal; naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz; taitz; taitzvfuddyonaka; thistimeforsure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-162 next last
To: RIghtwardHo
So? Where are the studies that show Americans are not interested in Obama’s eligibility?

As for you claim that this is a “conspiracy”, how can the following **FACTS** be a conspiracy?

Fact: Obama posted forgeries.

Fact: Obama fails e-verify.

Fact: Obama has multiple social security numbers and reputable private investigators ( independent from each other) are willing to put their licenses on the line about that.

Fact; Legislators in several states ( likely most of them attorneys) were concerned enough about Obama’s eligibility that they pushed through bills that landed on the desks of governors.

Fact: Obama has never proven that he is a natural born citizen.

Fact: Obama sent expensive attorneys to courts around the nation to prevent the release of common documents. In many of these courts, these attorneys were **taxpayer** paid. Why? For common documents that an ordinary American can produce in less than a week for under $100?

The above are FACTS. There is plenty of smoke there and a rational American should be reaching for a fire extinguisher.

81 posted on 10/08/2011 3:00:10 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
You say there is so much wrong with obama and I wholeheartedly agree.

You just made me realized that I have forgotten one possibility about you:

Maybe you're afraid of what you'll find if you did your own due diligence.

If so, how do you conquer your fear?

(I suggest starting with anger at what's been done and see where that takes you.)

82 posted on 10/08/2011 3:30:27 PM PDT by GBA (The Constitution and conservatism must win in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: GBA

When I see someone pooh-poohing a serious issue in almost 25% of the posts in this thread, I detect a troll. No point in feeding him.


83 posted on 10/08/2011 3:47:04 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo; GBA

Oh, the old “there are soooo many more importatn issues than this” - but these trolls seem to want to spend their precious valuable time trying to throw dirt in our eyes on these threads! Why don’t they spend their valuable time “fighting on the issues” they claim are so much MORE important? They reveal their intent every comment they make.


84 posted on 10/08/2011 4:06:19 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

For those points to be factual, a massive conspiracy would be required involving hundreds, if not thousands, of people across both political parties. All of them colluding to change records, falsify information, ignore laws, overlook real problems and act against their own and their party’s interests.

Given that there are alternate exlanations which can be applied to each of your “facts” (regardless of whether or not you accept those explanations), it seems to follow that to insist on your interpretation being correct requires the acceptance of this conspiracy.

Just sayin’.


85 posted on 10/08/2011 5:42:51 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

“For those points to be factual, a massive conspiracy would be required involving hundreds, if not thousands, of people across both political parties. All of them colluding to change records, falsify information, ignore laws, overlook real problems and act against their own and their party’s interests.”

Bingo, most liberals and RINO’s are lying about Obama’s life and his future intentions. Definately hundreds and maybe thousands of direct and indirect traitors.

I agree, for those who believe Obama, alternate explanations are needed for nearly everything in his past.

Are you going to believe me or your lying eyes? Obamo Marx


86 posted on 10/08/2011 7:33:38 PM PDT by TauntedTiger (Keep away from the fence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
Normal people don't have their lives filled with “alternate explanations”.
87 posted on 10/08/2011 7:57:43 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

What does that even mean?


88 posted on 10/08/2011 8:31:51 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Fact: Obama fails e-verify.

******

E-verify: How about this idea: Every candidate for president must pass an E-VERIFY Social Security check in each state before he is allowed to put his name on a presidential ballot in each state.

89 posted on 10/09/2011 3:20:12 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Re: “this is a non-issue with no evidence. And mine is, by far, the majority opinion. Even most GOP voters don’t even buy this.”

Your opinion is NOT the majority opinion:

http://theobamafile.com/_opinion/ThatsSomeFringe.htm

Re: “a non-issue with no evidence”

http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/BirthCertificateII.htm

http://theobamafile.com/ObamaCOLB.htm

http://theobamafile.com/_eligibility/SocialSecurity.htm

http://theobamafile.com/_eligibility/DraftRegistration.htm

To say there is no evidence identifies you as a stone Gullible:

http://theobamafile.com/_opinion/Gullibles.htm


90 posted on 10/09/2011 4:21:06 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
My conclusion: You are being deliberately dense.
91 posted on 10/09/2011 5:51:10 AM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56
No point in feeding him.

Might not be a him... RIghtward"Ho"....

92 posted on 10/09/2011 6:25:57 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

What specific ‘evidence’ have you seen and examined?


93 posted on 10/09/2011 6:53:10 AM PDT by Brian Hicks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
ROFL!! Yeah. Good luck with that.

The Iceberg cometh. When it hits, a lot will get changed i'll wager.

94 posted on 10/09/2011 7:34:17 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
You can’t impeach judges for any of this. You just can’t impeach judges because you don’t like their rulings. And be very glad of that or the Left would have eradicated conservative Judges long ago.

The Senate can impeach judges for any reason. They merely have to have sufficient votes.

95 posted on 10/09/2011 7:35:33 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith; RIghtwardHo
Your opinion is NOT the majority opinion:

http://theobamafile.com/_opinion/ThatsSomeFringe.htm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That's a mighty loud sound of crickets from RIghtwardHo!

96 posted on 10/09/2011 8:54:34 AM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

That is not true. They can only impeach for the same reason they can impeach a President.


97 posted on 10/09/2011 11:47:27 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Oh for HEAVEN’S sake it IS the majority view. Here is a poll during the height of the BC issue. only 25% of Americans suspected Obama wasn’t born in the U.S.

politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/04/cnn-poll-quarter-doubt-president-was-born-in-u-s/

Recent poll shows only 3% thin he was born abroad with 77% think he was born in the U.S.

Those are the facts. My opinion just isn’t the majority opinion, it is the super majority opinion.

You wanna spend some energy, spend it on Fast & Furious. Now THAT is an issue and maybe even an impeachable one. There are SO SO SO SO SO many others. This BC issue? It’s crap and it’s silly.


98 posted on 10/09/2011 11:53:07 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

If the BC issue is so silly why have you posted so many times in this one thread?

Go spend your time on the Fast and Furious threads if you think that’s more important. Stop stinking up this one.


99 posted on 10/09/2011 12:27:58 PM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
That is not true. They can only impeach for the same reason they can impeach a President.

You are making a peculiar argument. The Senate can "deem" anything it wants if it has the votes.

100 posted on 10/09/2011 12:46:52 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson