[Sola Veritas]

“I’d back either ticket. But as I said, Cain/Palin is an more certain, less divisive, and less expensive “win”.”

Cain is pretty sharp guy. But he isn’t quite ready to be POTUS yet. Of course, he would be preferable to Romney anyday of the week.

I say this in kindness and affection for the man, but Cain’s 999 plan is not doable and will never by law. I for one prefer to pay the income tax I’m paying now, and I don’t want to pay more sales tax. I hate sales taxes. Goodness, if his plan went through, we would be paying 18 cents on a dollar in my current state, plus I would be paying more income tax than I do now. To be honestly selfish...why should I even want such a thing?

I think Sarah is the best idea, and could deal with a Cain VP to give him some experience. But not the head chair.

[so_real]

I think Sarah is the best idea, and could deal with a Cain VP to give him some experience. But not the head chair.

I'm not opposed to that at all -- it's just the more costly route. With three decades of successful business experience and political run-ins dating back to the early 90's, I easily have as much confidence in Cain's abilities as I do Palin's. And in the current environment, I see advantage in Cain being the front runner. That is not at all to say I wouldn't be pleased with roles reversed.