Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: so_real

It is my belief, and has been for quite a while, that Hillary will be the candidate, but not necessarily after a primary battle.

Obama may step aside ‘for the good of the party’ and HRC comes to the rescue! As SoS HRC played no part in forcing Obamacare down our throats, she didn’t vote for any stimulus bills, she was not involved in any debt ceiling debates, she cannot be linked to Obama’s DOJ, etc. Her hands are clean!

And she presents an opportunity for the same gullible idiots who couldn’t pass up a chance to be a part of history by voting for the first black president — even if he was a socialist — to once again be a part of history by voting for the first woman president — even if she’s a socialist!

There are some that speculate that this was that plan all along: that HRC stepped aside in 2008, that BO would appoint her SoS (keeping her away from the fallout), that with the help of Blue Dog Dems elected on his coattails BO would force through whatever he could with no concern about the damage, and then he would fall on his sword opening the way for HRC to rescue the party and create another opportunity for an ‘historical’ election.

But a GOP ticket with Palin at the top spoils their party! It guarantees an historical election without requiring people to vote for HRC to achieve it. They have spent three years trying to destroy Sarah. I’ve seen nothing like it in my lifetime. IMO it’s not just that they fear Sarah’s candidacy for who she is and what she represents, it’s also that her candidacy foils their HRC as first female president campaign!


108 posted on 10/04/2011 11:45:54 PM PDT by highway61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: highway61

It is interesting speculation, I agree. But the historical improbability of a democratic primary contest, combined with the evident narcissism possessing Obama, compounded with the no-love-lost relationship between Hillary and Obama ... I see this as a very minimal risk. It's something that will be spoken guardedly by disaffected supporters in the Democrats camp, but unlikely to go main stream. It's a risk, I grant you. But I think there are greater risks, and basing a campaign tailored to managing it would be a mistake. I see your points and in many ways agree with them. I am just of a mind that there is a clear path to victory elsewhere.


113 posted on 10/05/2011 2:51:44 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson