Then There's MoRon Paul

Vanity | 9/29/11 | Alan Levy

[deweyfrank]

Amen. I will vote for any of them over the Commie in Chief.

[davisfh]

My biggest fear with this Ron Paul character is that he might run as an independent or a Libertarian and suck enough votes away from the Republican candidate, whoever that might be, and put Obama back in office. It has happened before.

[Absolutely Nobama]

Hmmm....I feel a blog coming on.... Ross Paul .... Right on the $$$$! This is why we Conevatives MUST stop MoRon before he cause any damage to the 2012 Election or the Conservative Movement.

[Irenic]

I wish there was no Ron Paul. It has ruined my favorite radio program, Mike Church.

[Absolutely Nobama]

We all wish there was no MoRon Paul, FRiend!

[John D]

My biggest fear with this Ron Paul character is that he might run as an independent or a Libertarian and suck enough votes away from the Republican candidate

My biggest hope is that he does run. No Republican would ever vote fore an anti-American surrender monkey who blames America for every problem in the world, who wants gays in out military, pleads for prostitution. No anyone who would think about voting for him would never vote Republican. Cut and Run's policies are almost identical to Obama's.
Cut and Run would take more votes from Obama than any Republican. One of his problems if he did run would be that some of the paulbots would probably vote for Obama. About the only difference between the two is that the surrender monkey thought it a bad idea to eliminate OBL.

[Smokin' Joe]

Maybe someone could explain how repealing DADT led to flamers in the ranks?

I, for one, figured they'd have to go back in the closet like before DADT, and get a dd if they were caught, not be allowed to swish away.

Since they weren't allowed to be 'open' before, there must have been more involved than a 'repeal'.

[Absolutely Nobama]

I agree.

[Designer]

I read your list and find nothing at all that is contrary to Ron Paul's position. In fact, you even missed a few important points that RP didn't.

So may I ask you to fill in the gaps in your thinking?

Please tell us how RP is not for all those things (and more). Doing so would help convince us that you might know what you're talking about.

[Designer]

"..some of the paulbots would probably vote for Obama."

No, we would not vote for Obama under any circumstances.

If the Republican nominee is not a conservative, (and I can think of only one in the race now) I will predict now that Obama will win again.

Choose wisely.

[Absolutely Nobama]

From the article:

“RuPaul (again, H/T Mark Levin) has stated that 9/11 was America’s fault. He disagreed with the elimination of Osama Bin Laden. He has voted for the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”.He has made it clear that he despises Israel (on Islamo-Nazi Iran’s state run television, no less). He has shown support for the abortion pill, RU-486. One of Ron Paul’s mentors, Murray Rothbard, was an anarchist. Paul’s svengali, Lew Rockwell, is also an anarchist. Thomas Woods, Paul’s pet professor, advocates reinstituting the Articles of Confederation. The Reverend Wright of the Republican Party has considered placing psychotic leftist Dennis Kucinich is his Cabinet. To top it all off, the Bizzare One was the 2009 Earmark King, out earmarking liberal giants like Nazi Pelosi, Pete Starke Naked, and Bawney Fwank. Ron Paul is to Conservative like kitten is to 3-4 run-stopping nosetackle.”

Exactly what is Conservative about any of this ?

[John D]

If the Republican nominee is not a conservative, (and I can think of only one in the race now)

While Cain is the most desirable conservative in the race I could support any of the Republicans running. Now if cut and run Paul would just move his primary run to the dimwit ticket. The surrender monkey is in no way Republican nor conservative.