No, the credibility of the data recorder is more important than the data, for without credibility the data has no value. This is why it would be nice to have a customer with some stature, who would not want their company's name associated with a fiasco.
For example, if NYC's Con Edison came out with a statement "We have been using an E-cat system in our metropolitan steam heating plant for the last few months, and can attest that the device produces net energy as stated, and generates energy at profitable levels", then things would be settled as far as public opinion was concerned, without regard to the statements of anybody else.
I repeat. The customer's name is irrelevant. What "is" relevant are the names and qualifications of the people doing the testing, the exact nature of the test, and the data therefrom.
And as near as I can tell from post #4, the customer's name and the location of the 1MW test will POSSIBLY be revealed on 6 October (when the single E-Cat test will be done at U. of Upsala).
This does NOT rule out the possibility that the customer's name will be revealed on the date of the test of the 1MW unit later in the month, and, in fact will almost certainly take place then. Getting the customer's name a couple of weeks early is "gravy".