When a liberal implies Republicans are racists, I tell him I voted for Allen Keyes long before he voted for Obama. Then I imply he was a racist longer than I was.
Cain has a great resume - I couldn’t care less what color he is - he could be aqua
for all I care.
But, the rats care - A LOT! He is their worst nightmare.
I reserve the right to despise white people as well as black(asians) and even hispanics..
Has nothing at all to do with their races..
I do believe that Herman Cain would make an excellent President and is just the kind of leader we need at this time!
I realize its probably best that it never happened, but keep in mind that the GOP nomination probably was Colin Powell’s for the taking back in 1996.
This is what liberals have done with their wanting-it-both-ways policies.
Remember this gem from the OJ trial?
Attorneys in Simpson case, Cochran and Darden, get in heated argument over 'racist question.'One thing is certain: no matter what side of an argument you are on with liberals, it will be the racist side.The latest incident began when Darden questioned defense witness Robert Heidstra, a neighbor of Nicole Brown Simpson, who claimed to have heard two voices arguing about 10:30 p.m. on the night Mrs. Simpson and her friend Ron Godman were murdered.
Darden angered Cochran when he asked Heidstra if he (Heidstra) had told someone that one of the voices sounded Black. Cochran emphatically objected to the question and Ito Sustained it. However, Heidstra continued speaking. That led to Ito yelling at him to "Wait! Wait!"
The jury was then ordered to leave and Darden defended his line of questioning by pointing out that an aquaintance of Heidstra's quoted him (Heidstra) as saying one of the voices sounded Black and like O. J. Simpson.
Cochran angrily responded: "I resent that statement. You can't tell by somebody's voice whether they sound Black. That's a racist statement."
-PJ
I do believe that Herman Cain has had two rounds of cancer,not a safe bet no matter what color one is.
My liking for Cain has nothing to do with race.
When liberals call me a racist, are they trying to convert me? Or are they trying to keep other liberals from being converted?
“Our last three presidents have all been polarizing leaders and each has managed to out perform his predecessor in this counter productive ability that causes Americans to dislike each other.”
Quite frankly I don’t think Bush or Clinton strove to be polarizing.
It was, and is, the public who is polarized. The country was united after 9/11 and the Libs/Dems made sure to destroy that unity.
Obama just dislikes America and Americans so, yes, he is very polarizing.
At this time I don’t see any way forward where there will be any comity in this country. You can see by looking at Wisconsin how the left’s minions will react when their privileges are taken away. Yet we cannot afford those privileges any more.
Illegal aliens are NOT going to get a general amnesty, so we can expect them to riot also.
It’s going to be an ugly few years. No republican should expect to “unite” people, the MSM will be sure that doesn’t happen. He or She will just have to find a way to do what needs to be done despite the calumny that will come his or her way.
For a lesson in how this is done please study Rudy Giuliani’s early years as NYC mayor. He brought that city back from the brink while every day being called a fascist and worse by all the finest people.
But, in the end, he won.
And, in the very, very end, he went out respected by all.
So, it can be done. And quite frankly I don’t see Giuliani as some kind of political genius, but he had determination and he did not give a hoot what the NY Times, etc. said about him.