Just this week the Washington Post had a rather prominent story on Sheriff Arapio’s investigation into Obama’s fraud and eligibility. The editors of this paper didn't need to do this. They could have **ignored** the story!
Why would the Washington Post bother to cover the story of Arapio’s investigation? Hm? Yes, the story took the usual jabs at the birthers, but surely the editors **know** that by simply giving space to Obama’s eligibility they will ( and are) reawakening this story. They know that by giving CPR to this dead horse that the story **will** revive, start to breathe, and have a beating heart again.
Hm?....
Yeah, because the Washington Post can be counted upon to push stories beneficial to our cause!
And I have a bridge to sell you.
This stuff has worked out quite well for them all around - why wouldn’t they want “BIRTHER MADNESS - ROUND 2!!!”???
The headline is not true, or at least it doesn’t jibe with the article, which says she met with staffers, and doesn’t say she met with the congresscritters
Very intereting that the WaPo did an article about Sheriff Joe’s investigation. Pinging FW to this thread if you haven’t seen it and wintertime’s comment.
Mocking is what Alinksyites do best...