Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919
Ahhh. I see how you arrived at that. I think, however, that "natives=natural born" might be distinguishable from "native born=natural born." That is, "natives" and "native born" not being the same set.

I've seen "native born" being applied to describe the set of people born on the land, without any consideration whatsoever to the citizenship or allegiance of their parents, hence my confusion.

445 posted on 09/21/2011 9:50:01 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
I think, however, that "natives=natural born" might be distinguishable from "native born=natural born."

It might be, but my point is that the Supreme Court gave a definition that shows no distinction between these terms and that BOTH are defined by having citizen parents. It's no coincidence, IMO, that Justice Gray used neither term to define the citizenship for Wong Kim Ark as he said was imparted via the 14th amendment.

446 posted on 09/21/2011 9:58:38 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson