AmericanVictory wrote, “...Wong Kim Ark, which, of course, did not even treat of Article II’s eligibility requirement which is evident from that case.”
I posted about half of the WKA decision, showing anyone who wants can read that AmericanVictory doesn’t have clue one about what he is writing.
It is hardly my fault that editor-surveyor & AmericanVictory lie in hopes that those who haven’t read the decision will believe them - which is what WorldNutDaily and Canada Free Press do as a matter of habit. And yes, it takes some room because WKA discussed the issue at great length, quoting many opinions going back to before the Constitution was written.
That is why the Indiana court used it in ruling that Obama DID meet the requirements of the Constitution. Because they can read...
Well, I am not going to be mean and name names, but there is somebody on this thread who just doesn’t think he has to read anything at all. He just MIND READS stuff and then criticizes it!!! I just hope he feels sooo embarassed that he will stop doing that and become a better person.
WKA had nothing to do with Article two, because no article two issue was before the court.
The US supreme court has only appelate jurisdiction, and thus their decision is only effective as to the issue before them, and to the extent that it was presented in the appealed decision.
WKA was denied citizenship to which he was entitled under the 14th ammendment. Nothing in article two of the constitution addresses anything about WKA’s plight. (your ridiculous tap dance not withstanding)
A reading of the decision makes it clear that they intended to, and very much did, clarify is that WKA was not a natural born citizen, but was a “native citizen,” a term the carefully created to firmly divide the two.
Your deliberate deception, and obfuscation through spamming with irrelevant, bandwidth consuming verbage is typical of your dishonest posting style.